Back to Revenge Porn Guide

Revenge Porn Statistics: How Common Is Non-Consensual Image Sharing?

Revenge porn is often discussed in emotional or legal terms. But data also shows how widespread non-consensual intimate imagery has become, and why it cannot be dismissed as rare or isolated.

Statistics and scope

How Common Is Revenge Porn?

Studies consistently show that a significant portion of the population has experienced some form of image-based abuse. Key findings include:

1 in 12adult social media users victimized

CCRI's 2017 nationwide study found 1 in 12 adult social media users had been victims of non-consensual distribution of intimate images.

1 in 8threatened with NDII

Beyond actual distribution, 1 in 8 adult social media users had been threatened with the sharing of intimate images. The threat alone causes serious harm. (CCRI 2017)

58%cases involve an ex-partner

In a CCRI survey of 361 victims, 57% identified an ex-boyfriend as the perpetrator, making intimate partner breakdown the leading route for image-based abuse. (CCRI 2014)

90%of victims are women

Nine in ten reported victims of non-consensual intimate image distribution identify as women, reflecting a stark gender disparity in targeting. (CCRI 2014)

Context

What the Research Reveals

Research from academic institutions, safety organizations, and cybercrime reports indicates that image-based abuse is not rare or isolated. It is a global digital safety issue affecting people across age groups, genders, and backgrounds.

This page summarizes key findings from research and reporting trends to give realistic context. For the full picture, visit our complete revenge porn guide.

Who is affected

Gender and Targeting Patterns

Women

More frequently targeted in reported cases, particularly in partner-based sharing and impersonation scenarios.

Men

Also affected, particularly in financial sextortion schemes originating from social media manipulation.

LGBTQ+ individuals

May face elevated risk in certain online spaces, with outing used as additional leverage by perpetrators.

Public-facing creators

Targeted more often due to visibility and the perceived reputational damage potential for viral spread.

Remember

Importantly, anyone can become a victim. Image-based abuse is about opportunity and control, not identity.

Who is affected

Age Groups Most Affected

Data from safety organizations shows higher vulnerability among younger, digitally active populations. This is often linked to behaviour patterns that increase exposure.

Who

Most affected groups

Young adults
University students
Active on social media

Why higher risk

Contributing factors

More digital sharing
Larger online networks
Higher exposure

However, cases span all age groups. Age is a risk factor, not a boundary.

Statistics and scope

Reporting Trends Over Time

Organizations tracking NCII reports consistently note year-over-year increases. These reflect both growing awareness and improved reporting mechanisms.

01

Year-over-year increases in reports

02

Greater awareness leading to more victims coming forward

03

Improved reporting tools on major platforms

04

Increased media coverage of digital abuse

For context on how these situations develop, see how revenge porn happens.

Statistics and scope

Global Observations

Different regions show different patterns, making cross-country comparison complex.

Some countries report higher sextortion rates, often linked to organised criminal networks operating across borders.

Others report more cases involving former intimate partners, tied to coercive control dynamics after relationship breakdown.

Regions with stronger digital-safety frameworks often see higher reporting rates due to greater trust in available systems.

Background

The Reality Behind the Numbers

Statistics help show scale, but they do not capture the full picture. Real numbers are likely significantly higher than reported figures, because many cases go unreported. Victims face barriers to coming forward.

01

Shame and self-blame

Stigma around intimate imagery causes many victims to internalize blame.

  • Victims often feel responsible even though the perpetrator is entirely at fault
  • Fear of judgement from family, friends, or employers keeps many silent
  • Cultural stigma around intimate imagery compounds the harm already done
  • Self-blame delays help-seeking and makes outcomes worse
02

Fear of escalation

Victims worry that reporting will draw more attention or provoke the perpetrator.

  • Concern that involving police alerts the perpetrator to spread content further
  • Fear that public reporting makes the situation more visible, not less
  • Uncertainty about whether platforms will act fast enough to matter
  • Worry that any action makes the perpetrator retaliate
03

Doubt that removal is possible

Many victims believe content online is permanent and nothing can be done.

  • Lack of awareness that professional removal services exist
  • False belief that once shared, images cannot be taken down
  • Uncertainty about platform reporting processes and their effectiveness
  • Previous failed attempts leading to learned helplessness
04

Hoping for silence

Some victims wait, hoping the situation resolves on its own.

  • Belief that not reacting will cause the perpetrator to lose interest
  • Avoidance of the emotional difficulty of confronting the situation
  • Unaware that early action significantly improves removal outcomes
  • Content spreading further during the period of inaction

Significance

Why These Statistics Matter

Understanding prevalence is not just academic. It has real consequences for how victims, platforms, and policymakers respond.

Reduce victim isolation

Knowing this is widespread helps victims feel less alone and more willing to seek help.

Demonstrate need for support

Scale data shows removal tools and legal frameworks are necessities, not optional extras.

Drive better platform policy

Data is the key driver behind policy improvements, legal reform, and safety regulation.

Promote digital safety education

Prevalence figures show where education is most needed and help target awareness campaigns.

Read more about legal dimensions on our is revenge porn illegal page, or return to the revenge porn overview for all resources.

Key takeaway

What you need to know

This is not a rare problem

An estimated 1 in 8 adults has been threatened with or experienced non-consensual image sharing. Behind every statistic is a real person dealing with a violation of privacy and trust.

Real numbers are higher than reported

Shame and fear keep many victims silent. Actual prevalence is likely significantly above what official figures capture.

Knowing you are not alone is the first step

Awareness reduces isolation. Understanding that support, legal options, and professional removal services exist makes a real difference to outcomes.

For more context, see our complete revenge porn guide.

Already affected?

If intimate content has been shared without your consent, Leakserv specializes in the rapid, discreet removal of damaging content from the internet. You don't have to handle this alone.

Get help nowGet help now→